469
have compared many of them obtained from a large Number of frogs with specimens of typical Drepanidium preparations Supplied by the London School of Tropical Medicine, and found them to correspond in Every respect – vide figure II-VI. These parasites therefore differed from the majority of the forms met with in the Edible frog-forms which I had up until recently distinguished as far as possible as the Dactylosoma and the Drepanidium, although Similar large parasites were found, but which were regarded as part of the Drepanidium cycle of development. I therefore suspected that the parasite found in the rock frog - a typical so-called Drepanidium - was something different from the type usually found in the Edible frog, and in order to obtain more definite information on the question, I attempted to cultivate or preserve the parasites alive outside the body in some form of culture medium.
2.
4.
469
have compared many of them obtained from
a
large Number of frogs with specimens of typical Drepanivium preparations Supplied by the London School of Tropical thedicine, and found them to correspond in Every respect _ vide figme !!-TI These parasites therefore differed from 12. majority of the forms met with in the Edib.3 frog-forms which I had up until recently. distinguished us for as possible as he Dactylosoma and the Drepanidium, wew although Similar large parasites were found. but which were regarded as part of
the Drepanidium cycle of development. I therefore suspected that the parasite found
in the tock frog - a typical so called Drepaniduim- was something different from
thpe
neually found in the Edible frog, and in order to obtain more definite information on the question, I attempted to cultivate or presens the parasites antive the body in some form of enclure
medium.
...For....
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.